http://www.linuslive.com/2004/03/accuracy-of-the-bible/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=accuracy-of-the-bible everybody has a story...mine starts here Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:35:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.linuslive.com/2004/03/accuracy-of-the-bible/#comment-22 epiphanyofhope Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:06:50 +0000 http://www.linuslive.com/?p=233#comment-22 This is one of the most intriguing articles on faith I have read. It is long, but well worth the read :) http://www.hypermetrics.com/personal/frd.html This is one of the most intriguing articles on faith I have read. It is long, but well worth the read
http://www.hypermetrics.com/personal/frd.html

]]> http://www.linuslive.com/2004/03/accuracy-of-the-bible/#comment-21 planetgal471 Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:27:35 +0000 http://www.linuslive.com/?p=233#comment-21 Galileo didn't prove Coperinicus right mathematically, Newton did. Galileo simply used different observations evidence to support Copernicus' theory. Copernicus was going on the observations of the ancient Greeks. Brahe added more observations to those of Copernicus and Galileo. Kepler used the observations of Brahe to "mathematize" the observations through his laws. It was Newton (or maybe Hooke depending on who you believe) who proved, mathematically, that such observations would only be possible if Copernicus' theory was right. I know a lot about this subject, it being the birth of modern astronomy. I can even give you the details of the Hooke/Newton questions. But I suppose this is all off subject... Galileo didn’t prove Coperinicus right mathematically, Newton did. Galileo simply used different observations evidence to support Copernicus’ theory. Copernicus was going on the observations of the ancient Greeks. Brahe added more observations to those of Copernicus and Galileo. Kepler used the observations of Brahe to “mathematize” the observations through his laws. It was Newton (or maybe Hooke depending on who you believe) who proved, mathematically, that such observations would only be possible if Copernicus’ theory was right. I know a lot about this subject, it being the birth of modern astronomy. I can even give you the details of the Hooke/Newton questions. But I suppose this is all off subject…

]]>